?

Log in

November 2006   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Agents are Go!

You thought I forgot, didn't you?

Posted by esaevian on 2004.08.30 at 12:18
Current Mood: chipperchipper
Current Music: What I'm Made Of... - Crush 40
Yes I have made a new site. I kind of rushed with it so I didn't put in the validation tags (Doctype, charset) on some of the pages. But validation aside (even though I would like to know how other browsers handle my site) I would like just a review on my layout. How it could be fixed up and all that.

http://www.code-bubble.net/

(x-posted to: webdesign)

Comments:


Kyle
kbfx at 2004-09-11 10:33 (UTC) (Link)
Aside from making entry into the site a little more clear (my eyes totally missed the click to enter text) you've got a great thing going.
zaskoda
zaskoda at 2004-10-04 14:14 (UTC) (Link)
arg, it won't load for me.
Esa
esaevian at 2004-10-04 16:10 (UTC) (Link)
I fell for one of Timmah's scams at hostaffect.com
LiDL
lidl at 2005-08-29 03:52 (UTC) (Link)
I really disprove of using frames, and the entry image is a little unclear and slightly pointless, if you got rid of the frame and centered the page using standard methods your page would suit from 800x600 up, (it is only 630ish px wide) there would be no need for the warnings and you could get right on with the content....

but I'm a bit of an accessability nazi so there you go....

oh yeah, black on black is really bad form too
Graphic Web Design Company in San Diego SEO
g13media at 2009-12-04 01:41 (UTC) (Link)

web design frames

search engines cant index frames so its not good from an internet marketing aspect.
Previous Entry  Next Entry